49 Comments
User's avatar
The Word Herder's avatar

THIS.

THANK YOU, KEITH AND FRANCES!

This is what I want every single human being to see and -- UNDERSTAND.

Expand full comment
The Word Herder's avatar

I forgot I said this and said it again, LOL. So I deleted the second one. xo xo

Here's my reaction: https://media.tenor.com/images/6ef8ee5f5fff73e6f96f0f66c83ee6a0/tenor.gif

Expand full comment
Allan's avatar

Thank you Keith. Between this and the calcification of the Pineal gland through the poison we consume the connection to the Soul is being severed. We should be in the Age of Enlightenment but instead we are being forced into the The Darkest Time of our collective Being.

Expand full comment
Toxicanadian's avatar

Thanks for this cross-post, Frances! Essential reading. 🙏🏻💖🙏🏻

Expand full comment
Tami Berman's avatar

Ha, I was using tuning forks before I became EMF sensitive. I have a whole set and some of Eileen Day McKusick's forks plus her book. I haven't tried them in a while. I'll have to give it a go again.

Expand full comment
Keith Cutter's avatar

I'll be interested to hear your results with the 136.1Hz

Expand full comment
Tami Berman's avatar

I haven't been able to listen to the entire interview, but how was this frequency chosen?

Expand full comment
Keith Cutter's avatar

Can't say, it's the one Dr Plothe mentioned in our conversation.

Expand full comment
Me's avatar
Nov 5Edited

One should not assume everything was "chosen". It was probably decided on because 10 times per second allows good reaction time from other devices and is not too long. Many of these things just happened because no-one bothered to check further for fear of being laughed at or alternatively simply thinking that "surely such a low wattage signal can't do any damage". I was in that last camp for many years, until I gradually learned how much evidence is just being ignored for the sake of convenience.

Remember Hanlon's razor: Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity.

Expand full comment
Keith Cutter's avatar

I understand, the programming runs deep.

Expand full comment
yantra's avatar

Hey Tami, my go-to RF cure when i get home (and my brain is still functioning well enough to actually remember to do it) is using my tibetan/indian style bells, especially a small very high-pitched handheld bell i ring all around my head at the temple area - really helps immediately w RF headaches. - it goes right in. makes sense, it provides an alternative vibration which seems to dissolve the messed up RF-ism. Also i have checked out eileen mckusick a bit and that seems very good too.

Expand full comment
Keith Cutter's avatar

OK, main topic here is on accurate assessment and remediation of synthetic EMF -- in this case, WiFi. I think Dr Plothe's suggestion is brilliant, but it's not a cure and it's really only helpful, I believe, if one already has access to a pristine environment. Let's focus, please, on elimination of this toxin in our homes.

Expand full comment
The Word Herder's avatar

Both, and I agree with you.

Expand full comment
Tami Berman's avatar

I think the tuning fork is giving me a headache. I'm not sure because I get them so easily now. I am not experiencing anything positive from it. Really, just being away from manmade radiation is when I feel the best.

Expand full comment
Keith Cutter's avatar

OK, good to know. Two questions: What's the RF in your home (and which meter) and was it the 136.1 fork?

Expand full comment
Tami Berman's avatar

I have a wristband meter from SLT and it reads green all over my house. The wifi is confined to my Husband's office and I don't enter there unless I have to. My washer and drier do emit wifi when it is on and I have to stay away to avoid exposure. Sometimes I have to pass by and am exposed. Hopefully that will be disconnected next week. I do expose myself when I go to the pool twice a week and when I need to shop for food. I did use the 136.1 fork.

Expand full comment
RadioFan's avatar

Namaste Mr. Cutter: This a really weighty article. I will have to read it carefully with

an undivided attention.

It seems that "Republicado" is condemned to be Roman Empire Redux. Some karmic aspect has come into play. In my limited understanding, there is no other way to explain this oblivion. With best regards.

Expand full comment
Keith Cutter's avatar

Well said. Where are you in assessment and remediation of WiFi in your home?

Expand full comment
RadioFan's avatar

Namaste Mr. Cutter: I have just stopped using the grounding mat/sheet. I have no control over the power line in the rear. While I have later bought, on your recommendation, the 3-axis 3851A of Gigahertz Solutions, I use the (lowly) TF2 to see the magnetic field variation at the rear. In the kitchen, it varies from about 8 mG (early morning) to a peak of 18 mG (daytime and evening). A move from this location seems to be the only option. Otherwise, our home is well-wired. I "surrendered" my mobile service last year and both RF emissions of the Wi-Fi router are turned off. The router is used just for the four Ethernet outputs.

Some family members, when visiting the area, have stopped staying with us because our Wi-Fi is gone!

Expand full comment
Keith Cutter's avatar

Excellent progress! I'm so sorry to hear of the elevated MF in your home -- that's a considerable exposure. The morning/evening variation, as you're likely aware, is due to rise and fall of electrical usage in neighbors' homes. In a four season climate i see seasonal rise and fall as well.

I'm glad your family members still visit, even if they don't stay overnight.

Expand full comment
RadioFan's avatar

Namaste Mr. Cutter: Those mG numbers are high no doubt, but on the TF2, those are the weighted numbers. They should be within 5 mG ideally.

I read the Wi-Fi article. How do we turn off the 10 Hz beacon? For example, can they be turned off merely by turning off the oscillator (2.4 GHz, 5 GHz, etc.)? Or must one remove the router altogether and replace it with a switch?

Thank you.

Expand full comment
Keith Cutter's avatar

Turning off the persistent beacon, if one MUST have WiFi in the home, is accomplished with the special router I mentioned in the article. Otherwise the best strategy is to go wired, which involves either using a wireless-incapable router, like the one mentioned, or a wireless-incapable switch. Hope this helps.

Expand full comment
RadioFan's avatar

Namaste Mr. Cutter: Today I decommissioned entirely the AX 1800 Netgear router whose oscillators were already turned off. Now there is a 5-port TP-Link switch, model TL-SG705. Hope the switch suffices. How do you measure/detect that 10 Hz beacon?! I suppose it requires a good quality spectrum analyzer or a good quality oscilloscope. Please correct/confirm as appropriate. Thank you.

Expand full comment
Luzzie's avatar

I loathe WiFi as well. Because my ears have been ringing, I used my Acousticom 2 to recheck the Cox Panoramic Modem/Router in my office to make sure the WiFi was off. It was off, but it was still emitting high radiation. After reading comments on a Cox message board, I logged into my Cox account and disabled WiFi there as well -- but it's still emitting high radiation. So now I need to get a modem and router that I can control. Always something!

Expand full comment
Keith Cutter's avatar

It's great you used your RF meter to verify!

Expand full comment
Peter Torito's avatar

Thank you for another great article Keith. Yes, you are absolutely right, WIFI and RF radiation in general alter all our body functions. I tell my personal story and experience and how I cured all my EMF related problems in my latest video. It is in Spanish but YT translated subtitles are available. Here's the link for those who are interested. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LZykSVzCw1g

Expand full comment
Jz's avatar

Maybe this isn’t a fix but what about removing home WiFi and going back to Ethernet? I’ve used a Cornet EMF meter for years now, exploring a lot of devices, environments, hot spots etc and I’m terrified at the RF levels that phones emit during calls, searches etc, levels that are as high as the router itself. Anyway, I have a child that is experiencing terrible electrosmog at school and am looking for practical solutions starting at home. You’ve given many solutions but still, wouldn’t reverting to Ethernet minimize the RF as well as ELF? I really look forward to yours or anyone’s insight as I’m ready to contact my telecom provider! Many thanks to you and your commitment to raising awareness! It’s so real.

Expand full comment
Keith Cutter's avatar

Yes Jz, that's an excellent idea. There are many things that can be done. At the end of this article you'll find other solutions for WiFi and your solution as well: https://keithcutter.substack.com/p/why-is-wifi-so-uniquely-harmful

Expand full comment
Michael LeVesque's avatar

Thanks for an excellent presentation.

The increase in wave length exposures is now beyond belief as well as the comprehension of any government elected representative. The Unites States Congress once had the Office of Technology Assessment that was staffed by brilliant people and researchers. It was a system that soon became copied by many countries. One of the most important jobs of the wireless industry was to destroy objective and authoritative analysis of technology. Here's the story:

"It had a full-time staff of 143 people and an annual budget of $21.9 million. The Office of Technology Assessment closed on September 29, 1995. The move was criticized at the time, including by Republican representative Amo Houghton, who commented at the time of OTA’s defunding that "we are cutting off one of the most important arms of Congress when we cut off unbiased knowledge about science and technology".[2] Most Republican legislators characterized the OTA as wasteful and hostile to GOP interests.

The following year 1996: Within 5 months later...

"Congress gave the FCC vast powers to regulate and de-regulate all digital markets when it passed the Telecommunications Act of 1996, signed by digital signature of President Clinton in the Library of Congress in February 1996. The FCC then essentially re-wrote the regulatory landscape for wireless and wireline communication."

The wireless industry is now the wealthiest and most powerful industry in the world and similar to the pharmaceutical/chemical industry has the world in a controlled, victimized, and helpless situation. Wealth rules and creates its own demise.

Expand full comment
Keith Cutter's avatar

Thanks Michael and I really want to emphasize -- the focus now needs to be on the productive actions associated with quantitative assessment followed by physics-based remediation tactics that result in a measurable reduction of personal and familial exposure. It's clear we need to take control of the electromagnetic environment in each of our homes as nobody is going to do that for us.

Expand full comment
Cheryl Mead's avatar

Thanks Keith. Great article and presentation. I have a tuning fork but not 136.1 Hz. They are out of stock so I'll have to wait. Makes a lot of sense.

Expand full comment
Keith Cutter's avatar

I've seen them on ebay as well. Nothing magic about the one I chose, just need the right frequency.

Expand full comment
Patricia A. Ormsby's avatar

Thank you for this, Keith. I recall the first time I tried staying at a hotel that had one central WiFi router , not even in our room. I caught the first respiratory bug that came by and stayed sick until I could get back home. I also recall a woman having a fit at 2 in the morning when she couldn't get a signal in her room at a hostel, because the owner shut it off at night so the residents (addicted to their phones) could get some sleep. The owner of a remote resort in Western Australia described tantrums by women in particular when they found out that there was no WiFi.

Away from home, I have no choice anymore but to camp.

Expand full comment
Keith Cutter's avatar

Patricia, Thank you so much for sharing your experiences and perception of this important issue.

Expand full comment
Edward Bernaysauce's avatar

these days it feels as if it’s getting harder to think outside of the kill-box...

with the low thrum whooshing- in certain specific public environments: either those festooned with towers, else cameras and employee/customer/ inventory tracking systems, or both.

& then there's the continual electronic screeching, most pronounced in the wee hours...

Expand full comment
Keith Cutter's avatar

More doom and gloom -- I get it. Let's focus on what we can do now. Where are you in your assessment and remediation efforts in your own home? There are so many things we can do right now to improve our home environment from an EMF perspective.

Expand full comment
Klaus Hubbertz's avatar

👍👍👍

Expand full comment
James Buffet's avatar

What about 100Hz broadcast to the general public or targeted areas?

Expand full comment
Luzzie's avatar

"Even in meticulously shielded environments, where WiFi and other sources of RF radiation are kept out, the body may continue to resonate with the artificial frequencies it was previously exposed to. " This is fascinating, and a great reminder to do release and reprogramming techniques.

Expand full comment
Lucas Nascario's avatar

The tuning fork technique was never discussed, I watched the entire thing, where exactly does he discuss the actual technique?

Expand full comment
Keith Cutter's avatar

Start at 15:03

Expand full comment