Each week, in a cramped room with terrible acoustics and more than forty people conducting a dozen or more simultaneous conversations, I’m still able to enjoy private conversations with one or two others.
In my mind, the term, 'Nature Deficit Disorder' simplifies what is going on with our inner landscape as well as our external one. Even if I could afford remediation, the noise of unspoken objection is getting louder and louder. I find Biofilm and Quantum Sensing phenomenon interesting and perhaps they are SOUND signals.
One thing I’ve come to appreciate over the years is just how signal-rich the natural world actually is—light cycles, living soil, plants, moving water, atmospheric rhythms. All of it forms an informational background that life has always been immersed in.
Modern environments tend to do the opposite: many of those signals disappear while various forms of artificial noise increase.
Life seems to function best when the signals of the living world are strong enough to be heard and we spend time therein. And when the noise floor rises high enough, that conversation becomes harder to maintain.
Thank you my friend, intersting point of view. So, do you imply we should spend more time in nature? It might actually work. I have decided to go to a fairly low RF level place, take my Faraday suit off for an hour a day and expose my nody to the sun. I could combine that with some earthing and connection with nature.
Thank you for this enlightening post.So looking forward to the time when we humans choose coherence with all Life over digital noise.
In my mind, the term, 'Nature Deficit Disorder' simplifies what is going on with our inner landscape as well as our external one. Even if I could afford remediation, the noise of unspoken objection is getting louder and louder. I find Biofilm and Quantum Sensing phenomenon interesting and perhaps they are SOUND signals.
That’s an interesting line of thought.
One thing I’ve come to appreciate over the years is just how signal-rich the natural world actually is—light cycles, living soil, plants, moving water, atmospheric rhythms. All of it forms an informational background that life has always been immersed in.
Modern environments tend to do the opposite: many of those signals disappear while various forms of artificial noise increase.
Life seems to function best when the signals of the living world are strong enough to be heard and we spend time therein. And when the noise floor rises high enough, that conversation becomes harder to maintain.
Thank you my friend, intersting point of view. So, do you imply we should spend more time in nature? It might actually work. I have decided to go to a fairly low RF level place, take my Faraday suit off for an hour a day and expose my nody to the sun. I could combine that with some earthing and connection with nature.
Thanks Peter, much to come -- perhaps 3 or 4 more essays, lots of details. I see sun as a nutrient. Earth contact? Depends. Time is a huge factor.